The Rt Revd Paul Butler, Bishop of Durham has spoken today Monday 26th June in the debate on the Gracious Speech (Queens speech at the opening of Parliament).
Bishop Paul began speaking at: 16:14:57
A transcript of his draft address is given below. The precise speech as delivered in the House of Lords can be viewed and downloaded in the official Hansard Transcript.
My Lords, I look forward to hearing from the noble lords, Lord Colgrain and Lord Mountevans, during this debate.
Since arriving in Durham, I have been struck that life feels more precarious for many in the North East than it does elsewhere. There are lots of reasons for hope- not least the social regeneration in my hometown of Bishop Auckland. But the sense of precariousness still persists due to deep structural disadvantages that the region has faced for decades, even centuries. It is against this backdrop that some of the changes to welfare in the last parliament felt particularly acute, and remain of very deep concern. It is also against this backdrop, that the uncertainty of the Brexit negotiation is felt.
It was in part this day-to-day experience of powerlessness that led many to vote to exit the EU. It would be a betrayal of the people, especially the most needy, if living and working in the North East becomes more precarious, not less, as a result of leaving the EU. I therefore welcome that much of the Gracious Speech indicated some awareness of this danger. I want to reflect on three aspects of this.
First, the Gracious Speech included a commitment that:
“Legislation will be introduced to ensure the United Kingdom remains a world leader in new industries, including electric cars”
It will be no surprise to those who know the North East that my ears perked up at “electric cars”. We have a proud history of manufacturing and the importance of the industry to the region needs to be prioritised in Brexit negotiations. We must develop further decent technological education and training that leads to good jobs. This must include engaging with the challenges that the next generation of automation will pose to the livelihoods of people and communities in the North East and across the country. The Church of England has already carried out some invaluable work on the economic and ethical implications of automation and Artificial Intelligence. We look forward to working with the government to ensure that this work is used to make sure that we develop an Industrial Strategy ready for the challenges and opportunities that it will pose.
Second, the Gracious Speech included a commitment that:
“A new bill will also be brought forward to deliver the next phase of high-speed rail.”
This will be between Birmingham and Crewe.
A more inter-connected country is to be welcomed. I would, however, like to repeat a proposal I made in the debate on the Gracious Speech last year that we start building from Newcastle too. I worry that as long as we continue the approach of gradually moving north we give the impression that the point of the project is to let the rest of the country share some of the benefits of London. But if we think that HS2 is truly for the benefit of the whole country then I encourage the government to adopt a different approach. This must include serious investment in the whole of the rail network and the related infrastructure in and between every region. In Newton Aycliffe the new Zuma trains are being built. It would be a tragedy if the region that builds the new trains does not benefit from them.
The rest of the country needs the North East. We are a region that, despite uncertainties and higher levels of unemployment, is in many ways thriving and has plenty of untapped potential.
Take our science and technology sector. The ONS finds that our life sciences and healthcare sector is the largest in England in population terms. Overall, this sector has 221,300 people working for more than 14,000 others. That puts us behind only the South East and East of England.
We also have enormous capacity for renewable energy: through water, wind, and dark skies. It is these kind of opportunities that the Industrial Strategy must seize. Water, wind and skies also highlight the importance of integrating our environmental priorities within the Industrial Strategy. An humane and wholesome Industrial Strategy must be environmentally friendly and connect with a farming and food strategy.
Finally, I was glad to hear commitments in the Gracious Speech on the National Living Wage, although I hope we go even further than promised to a proper Living Wage. I welcome the commitment to workplace rights and ending discrimination. I hope the latter will include ending discrimination, and that which affects refugees.
The ultimate point of the Northern Powerhouse must not be simple economic growth but thriving communities. As we discuss the details of these measures and the wider Industrial Strategy, we must strive to incentivise investment that serves the poorest and strengthens communities. This underlines the importance of faith groups and other parts of civil society being strongly included in the discussions of Industrial Strategy.
Many communities across the North East and the wider country have had decades of experiencing politics as being ‘done to’ rather than ‘working with’. As this parliament considers Brexit, the Industrial Strategy and the Northern Powerhouse, we must engage people of all ages, including children, in the debate. Each of these discussions is an opportunity to invite all people into the process of building a Britain that truly works for everyone in every part of the country, for the generations to come.